Audyense
Airtable
Project Management · www.airtable.com
Overview
Airtable is a cloud no-code platform that combines a relational database with spreadsheet-style editing, letting teams model projects as linked records and view the same data as a grid, kanban board, calendar, timeline or Gantt chart. Around that core it layers automations, scripting, Interfaces for stakeholder-facing dashboards, and Airtable AI agents. It is sold per editor seat across Free, Team, Business and Enterprise Scale plans, with record, attachment and automation-run caps rising at each tier.
The problem Airtable solves
Project trackers usually start life as a shared spreadsheet and break the moment work needs to be linked, filtered per audience and kept current automatically. Airtable addresses that by making the tracker a relational database with linked records, then rendering it as whichever view each audience needs and automating the busywork between updates. The trade-off buyers report is that structure and scheduling rigour have to be built by hand, and that capacity limits and per-editor pricing become the real constraint as the tracker grows.
Decision context
Use these points to test whether the product fits your operation, not just whether it has a long feature list.
- Published starting price: Free. Confirm user, usage, and feature limits for the plan you would actually buy.
- Deployment: cloud. Check security, data-residency, and access requirements for every team that will use it.
- Verified integrations include Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira, Zendesk, Gmail. Validate sync direction and plan limits for the connections that matter.
- This record was last checked on 7/31/2026; pricing and features can change.
How to evaluate Airtable
A listing helps create a shortlist; a trial with the team’s real workflow decides whether the tool fits. Use this reading with the structured facts and confirm changes with the vendor.
Workflow fit
The record describes it as a fit for Ops, marketing and creative teams that have outgrown spreadsheet project trackers and want a relational base with automations behind them, Cross-functional projects where the same records must be read as a board, a calendar and a timeline by different audiences, Teams that need many read-only stakeholders on a project view, since only editors are billed on Team and Business plans. Check that this context matches the volume, roles, and processes your team needs it to support.
Pilot questions
- Can Airtable complete the critical workflow without manual work outside the product?
- Do the recorded connections (Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira) support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
- What user, usage, storage, support, or security limits appear after the headline starting price?
Evidence and freshness
This record was checked on 7/31/2026. That date tells you when the record was reviewed, not that the vendor has left its terms unchanged since then.
Best for
- Ops, marketing and creative teams that have outgrown spreadsheet project trackers and want a relational base with automations behind them
- Cross-functional projects where the same records must be read as a board, a calendar and a timeline by different audiences
- Teams that need many read-only stakeholders on a project view, since only editors are billed on Team and Business plans
Not a fit if
- Teams that need rigorous critical-path scheduling, native subtasks, baselines and resource-capacity planning out of the box — Airtable expects you to build that yourself
- Large contributor pools or high-volume trackers on a tight budget, where per-editor seat cost and per-base record caps compound fast
Why it’s listed
- One of the most widely adopted ways teams build custom project trackers without a developer, with a genuinely free tier to start on.
- Ships native Gantt, timeline, kanban and calendar views over the same relational dataset, so a single project base serves planners, doers and executives.
- Belongs in a project-management shortlist as the flexible-database option — buyers routinely weigh it against dedicated PM tools, and the trade-offs are well documented.
Pricing
Free
FreeEntry tier for individuals and very small teams building lightweight trackers.
- Unlimited bases
- 1,000 records per base
- 1GB attachment space per base
- 100 automation runs per month
- Public forms and 14-day revision history
- 500 AI credits per user per month; up to 5 editors and 50 commenters
Team
$20 per seat / month billed annuallyFirst paid tier, adding real capacity plus the paid-only Gantt and timeline views.
- Unlimited bases
- 50,000 records per base
- 20GB attachment space per base
- 25,000 automation runs per month
- 1-year revision and snapshot history; 10 synced tables
- 15,000 AI credits per user per month; priority support
Business
$45 per seat / month billed annuallyDepartmental tier adding data scale, more automation headroom and admin controls.
- Unlimited bases
- 100,000 records per base
- 100GB attachment space per base
- 100,000 automation runs per month
- 2-year revision and snapshot history; 20 synced tables
- 20,000 AI credits per user per month
Enterprise Scale
FreeOrg-wide tier with the largest limits, governance and SSO; priced by sales.
- Unlimited org units, workspaces and bases
- 500,000 records per base
- 1TB attachment space per base
- 1,000,000 automation runs per month with 3-year run history
- 3-year revision and snapshot history; 20 synced tables
- SAML/SSO, dedicated customer success manager and priority support
Features
Integrations
Security & compliance
Pros & cons
Pros
- The same project dataset can be viewed as grid, kanban, calendar, gallery, list, timeline or Gantt, which reviewers cite as its standout advantage over single-layout PM tools
- Automations and scripting handle routine project chores (status routing, notifications, record creation) without code, and are available even on the Free plan at 100 runs per month
- Read-only collaborators, form submissions and share links are not billed on Team and Business plans, so stakeholder visibility is cheap to extend
- Deep integration surface plus a large template library, including project management, product roadmap and resource allocation starters
Cons
- Steep learning curve is the single most repeated complaint on Capterra and TrustRadius — reviewers say it is noticeably harder than the no-code marketing implies
- Per-editor seat pricing scales sharply: $20/seat/month on Team and $45/seat/month on Business when billed annually, and anyone with edit rights on any base counts
- Per-base record caps force tier jumps rather than gradual growth — 1,000 records on Free, 50,000 on Team, 100,000 on Business, 500,000 on Enterprise Scale
- It is not a full substitute for a dedicated PM tool: Gantt and timeline views require a paid plan, time tracking depends on a Marketplace extension, and reviewers note the kanban view falls short of Jira-class boards
What we found
Capterra shows Airtable at 4.6 out of 5 across roughly 2,240 verified reviews, the largest review base we could read directly, and TrustRadius reports a trScore of 8.5 out of 10. Across both platforms reviewers consistently praise the flexibility of views and automations while flagging a steeper learning curve than the marketing suggests, per-seat cost as contributor counts grow, and paywalled capacity.
Ratings and review counts come from public review platforms. We link to the original source and keep the underlying review text out of this profile.
User reviews
Written by Audyense accounts · moderated before publishing
No user reviews yet.
Used Airtable? Be the first to tell other buyers what actually worked.