Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Starnus vs. Zipteams

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Zipteams starts at $10 per seat, versus Starnus at $50.

Full comparison

Starnusfrom $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Zipteamsfrom $10 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Low32AS*Low
PositioningAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Zipteams is an AI-first CRM tool built to improve telesales and customer interactions.
Free tierNoYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • Free$30
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
AI-powered lead prioritization—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Personalized sales conversations—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automated follow-ups—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time sales forecasting—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integration with existing CRMs—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Insights from unstructured customer data—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Conversation intelligence—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Buyer engagement—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
E Meeting—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI meeting notes—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—5+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 2 reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
HubSpotCloseLinkedInInstagramAPI
Security & compliance——
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: AI-powered lead prioritization
  • Documented capability: Personalized sales conversations
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Zipteams is recommended for sales teams and organizations who want to turn their true voice of customer into actionable insights, improve sales qualit
  • Public profile names HubSpot, Close, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Starnus ↗Visit Zipteams ↗