Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Starnus vs. Whova

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Starnus starts at $50 per seat, versus Whova at $3,000.

Full comparison

Starnusfrom $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Whovafrom $3,000 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Low31AS*Low
PositioningAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Whova is an all-in-one event management platform designed for organizing in-person, hybrid, and virtual events.
Free tierNoYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Event registration—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Agenda management—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Attendee networking—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Live announcements—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation tools—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Kiosk self check-in—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Crms—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—2+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 2 reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
LinkedInAPI
Security & compliance——
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: Event registration
  • Documented capability: Agenda management
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Whova is perfect for event organizers who want to save time managing logistics and create better experiences for attendees. Trusted by Michigan Histor
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Starnus ↗Visit Whova ↗