Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Starnus vs. Waterfall

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Starnus starts at $50 per seat, versus Waterfall at $149.

Full comparison

Starnusfrom $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Waterfallfrom $149 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Low32AS*Low
PositioningAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Waterfall is a data enrichment API built for GTM and revenue teams to get accurate contact info from 30+ data sources in one place.
Free tierNoYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Track job changesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find verified emailsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find mobile numbersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Verify emails in real-timeYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Global contact coverageYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Usage-based pricingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Visitor IdentificationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Waterfall enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 2 reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
SlackMakeLinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: Track job changes
  • Documented capability: Find verified emails
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Waterfall is recommended for GTM and revenue leaders at top B2B companies who need one API to find prospects, verify emails, track job changes, and ge
  • Public profile names Slack, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Starnus ↗Visit Waterfall ↗