Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Starnus vs. Viewed

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Starnus starts at $50 per seat, versus Viewed at $72.

Full comparison

Starnusfrom $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Viewedfrom $72 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Low33AS*Low
PositioningAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Viewed is a video-in-email tool designed to embed autoplay videos directly into email campaigns.
Free tierNoYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • Free$42
  • Basic$372
  • ProfessionalCustom pricing
  • Business$8
Embed video in emails—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Autoplay video in inboxes—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI video from images—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Personalized data-driven videos—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Unlimited video hosting—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time campaign analytics—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Video Prospecting—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video Outreach—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—6+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 2 reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
MakeLinkedInFacebookInstagramTwitterAPI
Security & compliance——
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: Embed video in emails
  • Documented capability: Autoplay video in inboxes
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Viewed is recommended for brands and marketers who want to boost engagement by embedding autoplay videos directly into emails, creating personalized v
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Pricing and usage limits should be rechecked before purchase
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Starnus ↗Visit Viewed ↗