Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Starnus vs. Tray

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Tray starts at $19 per seat, versus Starnus at $50.

Full comparison

Starnusfrom $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Trayfrom $19 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Low32AS*Low
PositioningAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Tray is an AI-ready integration platform designed to build and deploy AI agents easily.
Free tierNoYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
AI-ready integration platform—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Build and deploy agents—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Pre-built agent accelerators—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Low-code AI automation builder—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Secure AI data handling—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Scalable governance and compliance—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Api Connector Agents—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Checkout Optimization—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—5+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 2 reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
SlackMakeLinkedInFacebookAPI
Security & compliance——
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: AI-ready integration platform
  • Documented capability: Build and deploy agents
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Tray is perfect for teams that want to quickly build and use AI agents without complexity, especially if you work with Slack, web apps, or APIs. Compa
  • Public profile names Slack, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Starnus ↗Visit Tray ↗