Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Starnus vs. Tomi

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Starnus starts at $50 per seat, versus Tomi at $3,500.

Full comparison

Starnusfrom $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Tomifrom $3,500 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Low32AS*Low
PositioningAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Tomi.ai is a predictive marketing tool designed for high-ticket e-commerce and lead generation businesses.
Free tierNoYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • Free$3,500
  • Basic$6,000
  • Starter$6,000
  • ProfessionalCustom pricing
Predictive lead scoring in real-timeYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Value-based audiences for targetingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Predictive conversions for biddingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Forward-looking ROI measurementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Behavioral data analysisYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
CRM and analytics integrationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Audience targetingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified5+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 2 reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
CloseLinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
Security & compliance
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: Predictive lead scoring in real-time
  • Documented capability: Value-based audiences for targeting
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Tomi.ai is recommended for high-ticket e-commerce and lead generation businesses with narrow target audiences, long sales cycles, and complex or large
  • Public profile names Close, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Starnus ↗Visit Tomi ↗