Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Okappy vs. Starnus

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Okappy starts at $29 per seat, versus Starnus at $50.

Full comparison

Okappyfrom $29 per month
Starnusfrom $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Audyense Score32AS*Low44AS*Low
PositioningOkappy is a field service management platform designed to help contractors, suppliers, and subcontractors manage jobs in real time.AI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.
Free tierYesNo
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitSMB, Mid-market, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • Free$29
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • GrowthCustom pricing
  • Business$9
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
Manage subcontractors and employeesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
See live and completed jobsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Add photosYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
imagesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
signaturesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Share job statuses with customersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Raise invoices quicklyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrates with other platformsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified5+
Aggregate rating · No reviews yet5.0 · 2 reviews
Integrations
HubSpotLinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
Security & compliance
Pros
  • Documented capability: Manage subcontractors and employees
  • Documented capability: See live and completed jobs
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Okappy is perfect for contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers who want to manage field service projects easily and in real-time. It helps increase
  • Public profile names HubSpot, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
Cons
  • Pricing and usage limits should be rechecked before purchase
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
Visit Okappy ↗Visit Starnus ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Okappy

Okappy is a field service management platform designed to help contractors, suppliers, and subcontractors manage jobs in real time. It fits in the category of workforce and project management tools, focusing on improving efficiency and communication. What sets Okappy apart is its unique networked system that shows every live and completed project on one platform, saving time and reducing mistakes. The tool shines in industries like facilities management, fire and security, drainage, HVAC, and pest control. Users can connect teams, assign work, track updates, share job statuses with customers, and raise invoices quickly. Results come fast since it simplifies job management from day one, helping businesses improve customer service and get paid faster. Okappy integrates smoothly with other software systems, allowing users to view all operations through a single screen and login. It’s not designed to replace heavy ERP or accounting systems but works best as a specialized field service and subcontractor management tool. If you want faster job handling, less admin, and better control over subcontractors, Okappy delivers that simply and effectively.

A particularly good fit for: perfect for contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers who want to manage field service projects easily and in real-time. It helps increase efficiency, improve SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise teams with a defined revenue workflow community building platforms

May be a poor fit if: Teams needing replace heavy ERP or accounting systems but works best as a specialized field service and subcontractor management tool Teams that need unlimited usage without plan or credit limits

Starnus

Starnus is an agentic outbound sales platform for B2B teams that want to move from ICP definition to lead discovery, enrichment, personalized outreach, and reply tracking inside one workflow. It positions itself as an AI employee for outbound sales, with the goal of reducing the manual work involved in running lean GTM motions.

A particularly good fit for: Solo founders and small B2B teams doing outbound without a dedicated SDR

May be a poor fit if: Enterprises needing established vendor track record and reviews

Pricing and plan structure

Okappy: Published starting price $29 per month

  • Free$29 per user/month
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • GrowthCustom pricing
  • Business$9 per month

Starnus: Published starting price $50 EUR per month (Pro)

  • Pro$50 EUR/month
  • Pro+$125 EUR/month
  • Ultra$250 EUR/month
  • Managed Service$900 EUR/month starting

Capabilities worth validating

  • Okappy: Manage subcontractors and employees, See live and completed jobs, Add photos, images, signatures Integrations include HubSpot, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter.
  • Starnus: the record has no feature-level evidence yet; verify the workflow directly. Integrations include Smartlead, Unipile, HubSpot, Perplexity.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Okappy's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Starnus's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for HubSpot, LinkedIn, Facebook support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between Sales & CRM tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative Sales & CRM workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through HubSpot, LinkedIn, Facebook: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Some signals in these records are still incomplete. Treat that as a prompt to validate the workflow directly, not as a claim that a feature does not exist.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-08-25. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Okappy product site, ColdIQ profile, Vendor website; Starnus product site, Product Hunt, Starnus