Side-by-side record

Humaans vs. Leapsome

A side-by-side view of the product records we have today. Use it to narrow the question, then confirm current pricing, limits, and security details with each vendor.

The short version

Humaans starts at $8 per seat, versus Leapsome at Custom pricing. Humaans carries the higher aggregate rating (4.8/5 vs 4.8/5). Humaans lists more integrations (90+ vs 50+).

Full comparison

	Humaansfrom $8 per employee / month	Leapsomefrom Custom pricing
Audyense Score	78ASStrong	72ASStrong
Positioning	Modern HRIS for fast-growing, globally distributed teams	AI-powered people platform for performance, engagement, and HR
Free tier	No	No
Deployment	Cloud / SaaS	Cloud / SaaS
Best fit	SMB, Mid-market	SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans	Growth$8 EnterpriseFree Athena (Agentic AI)Free	Talent modules (Reviews, Goals, Surveys, Learning, Compensation)Custom pricing HRIS moduleCustom pricing Enterprise / full platformCustom pricing
Applicant tracking (ATS)	PartialNo native ATS; integrates with Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workable and others	PartialRecruiting module in early access plus native ATS integrations
Benefits administration	PartialBenefits tracking plus integrations (e.g. Ben); not a full US benefits admin suite	NoNo native benefits administration
Employee directory & org chart	YesPeople directory is a core feature	YesCentralized employee data and directory in the HRIS module
Employee onboarding	YesAutomated onboarding and offboarding workflows	YesAutomated onboarding workflows and onboarding learning paths
Mobile app	PartialMobile-friendly web app and employee self-service; limited dedicated native app	YesiOS and Android apps plus Slack/Teams access
Payroll	PartialPayroll-ready data and integrations (Deel, Remote, Pento, etc.); no full native payroll engine	NoPayroll prep and integrations only, not native payroll processing
Performance reviews	PartialDelivered via integrations with Lattice, Leapsome, Culture Amp; not native	YesCore capability with templates, calibration, and 360 feedback
Public API	YesDocumented REST API plus webhooks (Enterprise)	YesAPI available for custom integrations alongside prebuilt connectors
Reporting & dashboards	YesBuilt-in insights, analytics, and automated reports	YesAnalytics and dashboards across reviews, goals, and surveys
Time-off & PTO management	YesNative absence/time-off management and tracking	YesAbsence management included in the HRIS module
Integrations verified	90+	50+
Aggregate rating	4.8 · 108 reviews	4.8 · 2.5k reviews
Integrations	SlackGreenhouseLeverAshbyWorkableLattice+9 more	SlackMicrosoft TeamsBambooHRPersonioHiBobWorkday+9 more
Security & compliance	SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPR	SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR
Pros	Clean, minimalist, and fast interface that is easy to learn Smooth, automated onboarding/offboarding and document management Broad integration marketplace plus an open API and webhooks Responsive product team that ships quickly and acts on customer feedback	Clean, user-friendly interface that is easy for teams to adopt. Combines performance reviews, feedback, engagement surveys, goals, and learning in one system. Automated review cycles and templates save significant time each round. Responsive and helpful customer support.
Cons	Some integrations carry extra cost or setup effort No full native payroll suite - relies on integrations/exports No native ATS or performance-review module (handled via integrations) Pricing is quote-only, with no public per-employee rate or free plan	Pricing is steep for smaller teams, and paying per module adds up quickly. Initial setup and configuration require meaningful effort. Navigation can take too many clicks to locate data or complete tasks. Goal/OKR management often requires manual updates and has customization limits.
	Visit Humaans ↗	Visit Leapsome ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Humaans

Humaans is a cloud-based HRIS (human resources information system) built for high-growth and globally distributed companies. It centralizes the employee lifecycle - people directory, onboarding/offboarding automation, document and absence management, workflows, and analytics - with a fast, minimalist interface and a developer-friendly API. Rather than bundling native payroll or a full ATS, it emphasizes deep integrations with best-of-breed payroll, ATS, and performance tools. Founded in 2020 and backed by Y Combinator (W21), it remains an independent company headquartered in London.

A particularly good fit for: Fast-growing startups and scale-ups (SMB to mid-market) wanting a modern core HR system Globally distributed teams that need to centralize employee data across entities HR/IT teams that want to build a best-of-breed stack via integrations and API rather than an all-in-one suite

May be a poor fit if: Companies needing built-in native payroll processing rather than payroll integrations/exports Large enterprises wanting a single all-in-one suite with native ATS and performance modules

Leapsome

Leapsome is an AI-powered people-enablement and HR platform that unifies HRIS with a talent suite covering performance reviews, goals/OKRs, engagement surveys, learning, compensation, and continuous feedback on a single data foundation. Founded in 2016 and headquartered in Berlin, it serves 2,000+ organizations from startups to enterprises. The modular design lets teams adopt performance management, engagement, or full HRIS capabilities and layer AI-assisted reviews, analytics, and workflows on top. It emphasizes EU data hosting, GDPR compliance, and ISO 27001 certification.

A particularly good fit for: Mid-market and enterprise HR/People teams wanting performance, engagement, and goals in one platform. Companies running structured review cycles and OKR/goal programs at scale. European organizations needing GDPR compliance and EU data hosting.

May be a poor fit if: Very small or budget-constrained startups, where per-module pricing adds up quickly. Teams needing native payroll processing or full benefits administration.

Pricing and plan structure

Humaans: Published starting price $8 per employee / month

Growth$8 per employee / month (historical entry price; now quote-based)
EnterpriseFree
Athena (Agentic AI)Free

Leapsome: Published starting price Custom pricing

Talent modules (Reviews, Goals, Surveys, Learning, Compensation)Custom pricing
HRIS moduleCustom pricing
Enterprise / full platformCustom pricing

Capabilities worth validating

Humaans: Applicant tracking (ATS), Benefits administration, Employee directory & org chart, Employee onboarding, Mobile app Integrations include Slack, Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby.
Leapsome: Employee directory & org chart, Applicant tracking (ATS), Employee onboarding, Mobile app, Performance reviews Integrations include Slack, Microsoft Teams, BambooHR, Personio.

Questions to answer before switching

Does Humaans's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
Does Leapsome's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
Does the exact integration path for Slack, Greenhouse, Lever support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between HR & People tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

Start with a representative HR & People workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
Test the complete path through Slack, Greenhouse, Lever: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Structured signals help narrow the shortlist, but a trial with a real workflow is still the best way to validate the decision.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-07-21. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Humaans product site, G2, Capterra; Leapsome product site, G2, Capterra