Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

groundcover vs. Rootly

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

groundcover starts at $20 per seat, versus Rootly at $20. groundcover carries the higher aggregate rating (4.8/5 vs 4.8/5).

Full comparison

groundcoverfrom $20 per host/month
Rootlyfrom $20 user/month
Audyense Score48AS*Low79ASStrong
PositioningFull-stack cloud-native APM and observability platformSlack-native incident management and on-call automation
Free tierNoNo
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitSMB, Mid-market, EnterpriseSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Standard$20
  • Incident Response Essentials$20
  • On-Call Essentials$20
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • AI SRECustom pricing
AI features—YesAI scribe, similar-incident detection, and an AI SRE product for root cause and remediation
Public API—YesPublic API plus API/MCP access noted for the AI SRE product
Infrastructure monitoring—NoDoes not monitor infrastructure itself; ingests signals from monitoring integrations
Application performance monitoring (APM)—NoNot an APM tool; integrates with Datadog, New Relic, and Dynatrace
Log management—NoNo native log management; integrates with tools like Splunk and Datadog
Distributed tracing—NoNo native tracing; relies on integrated observability tools
Alerting & on-call—YesDedicated On-Call product with alert routing, schedules, and escalations (separate tier)
Incident management—YesCore product: Slack-native incident response, roles, timelines, and retrospectives
CI/CD pipelines—PartialIntegrates with GitHub, GitLab, and deployment tools and ingests deploy events, but is not a CI/CD system
Self-hosting / on-prem—NoCloud-only SaaS; no self-hosted or on-prem deployment offered
Integrations verified—100+
Aggregate rating4.8 · 26 reviews4.8 · 74 reviews
Integrations
AWSGoogle CloudAzureKubernetesSlackLinear+2 more
SlackMicrosoft TeamsPagerDutyOpsgenieDatadogNew Relic+10 more
Security & compliance—
SOC 2 Type IIHIPAAGDPRCCPA
Pros
  • Ease of implementation
  • Data stays in customer's own cloud (BYOC)
  • Fast querying/performance
  • Deep Slack integration automates incident channel creation, role assignment, and workflows without leaving chat
  • Automatic timeline and action capture cuts down manual post-mortem reconstruction
  • Strong bi-directional integrations with tools like Datadog, Jira, and PagerDuty
  • Simple, publicly listed per-seat pricing with no per-alert or surprise upsell fees compared to some rivals
Cons
  • Newer platform vs. incumbents like New Relic and Grafana
  • Advanced workflow configuration has a real learning curve and documentation gaps slow setup
  • On-call is a separate priced product tier, meaningfully increasing all-in per-user cost (~$30-$35/user/mo)
  • The UI can feel overwhelming when many workflows are configured
  • AI/MTTR marketing claims use non-standard metrics, making direct platform comparisons harder
Visit groundcover ↗Visit Rootly ↗