Audyense·
Skip to content
Side-by-side record

Gladly vs. Supportbench

A side-by-side view of the product records we have today. Use it to narrow the question, then confirm current pricing, limits, and security details with each vendor.

The short version

Supportbench starts at $32 per seat, versus Gladly at Custom pricing. Supportbench carries the higher aggregate rating (4.9/5 vs 4.7/5). Gladly lists more integrations (43+ vs 15+).

Full comparison

Gladlyfrom Custom pricing
Supportbenchfrom $32 per agent/month
Audyense Score70ASStrong73ASStrong
PositioningPeople-centered customer service platform, not ticketsCustomer support software built for B2B complexity.
Free tierNoNo
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitMid-market, EnterpriseSMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • HeroCustom pricing
  • SuperheroCustom pricing
  • Professional$32
  • Enterprise$100
AI featuresYesNative AI (Sidekick) automates routine resolutions; brands report high AI resolution rates.YesIntelligent Support AI: search, summaries, sentiment, predictive CSAT, auto-tagging
Automation & macrosYesWorkflow automation, rules, and answers/macros for repeatable responses.YesRule-based routing (round-robin, priority, SLA-based) with macros and versioning
CSAT & satisfaction surveysPartialCSAT supported natively and via integrations like Delighted, Qualtrics, and Medallia Agent Connect.YesCSAT/NPS/CES survey engine listed on the pricing page
Knowledge base & help centerYesBuilt-in Answers/knowledge base powering self-service and agent assist.YesInternal and customer knowledge base with a dedicated KB product page
Live chat & messagingYesLive chat is a first-class channel in the unified conversation.YesNative Supportbench Chat widget, customizable and AI-assisted
Omnichannel supportYesCore strength: voice, email, chat, SMS, and social unified per customer.YesTicketing across email, chat, AI bot, and APIs; native integrations across voice, chat, and social
Public APIYesPublic REST API and developer platform (developer.gladly.com) plus app integrations.YesREST API at the Professional tier; higher-throughput Enterprise API at the Enterprise tier
Reporting & dashboardsPartialStandard dashboards exist, but reviewers say deep custom reporting is awkward and manual.—
Shared inbox & ticketingYesTeam collaboration on a single customer conversation replaces separate ticket queues.YesUnified inbox for multiple email addresses with shared agent visibility
SLA managementPartialSupports routing, prioritization, and task/escalation handling rather than a traditional ticket-SLA engine.YesDynamic SLAs and multi-level escalations, a core pricing-page feature
Mobile app—PartialNative iOS app exists and Android is supported, but reviewers say the mobile app lacks features available on desktop
Integrations verified43+15+
Aggregate rating4.7 · 1.2k reviews4.9 · 116 reviews
Integrations
ShopifyBigCommerceMagentoKlaviyoAttentiveRecharge+9 more
SalesforceHubSpotMicrosoft Dynamics 365JiraSlackMicrosoft Teams+9 more
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIPCI DSSGDPR
SOC 2
Pros
  • Single lifelong customer conversation across channels eliminates duplicate tickets and gives agents full context
  • Intuitive, agent-friendly interface that reviewers say makes support feel 'as easy as texting a friend'
  • Genuinely native omnichannel including built-in voice, plus responsive vendor support and onboarding
  • Strong e-commerce integrations pull order history and lifetime value directly into conversations
  • AI-driven features: case summaries, predictive CSAT/sentiment analysis, automated responses
  • Unified communication — emails, calls, and notes all in one place
  • Deep customization of workflows, dashboards, and automation rules
  • Cost-effective versus Zendesk/Freshdesk while offering comparable depth
Cons
  • Premium priced with minimum-seat commitments, making it inefficient for small teams
  • Reporting/analytics feels segmented and requires manual work to build in-depth custom reports
  • Occasional slowness loading past conversations, and reports of timeouts dropping calls
  • Some gaps noted (e.g. social comment handling, mobile app) and a learning curve requiring training
  • Steep learning curve, especially for automation and workflow setup in the first month
  • Notification and alert system lacks granularity and can overwhelm agents
  • Documentation described as informative but puzzling, with limited onboarding videos
  • Chat functionality described as basic with limited customization
  • Cases can sometimes be missed or duplicated
Visit Gladly ↗Visit Supportbench ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Gladly

Gladly is an enterprise customer service platform built around people rather than tickets, unifying voice, email, chat, SMS, and social into a single lifelong customer conversation. It layers AI (Sidekick) on top to automate resolutions while giving agents full customer context. It is most commonly adopted by consumer/retail and e-commerce brands running high-volume, relationship-driven support.

A particularly good fit for: Consumer and retail/e-commerce brands wanting relationship-based rather than ticket-based support Mid-market and enterprise CX teams consolidating voice, chat, email, SMS, and social into one workspace Teams that want native AI (Sidekick) to automate a high share of routine resolutions

May be a poor fit if: Small businesses or startups — high per-seat pricing plus 10+ seat minimums make it a large commitment Teams needing deep, self-serve custom analytics out of the box without extra reporting work

Supportbench

Supportbench is an account-aware B2B helpdesk that replaces basic ticketing with account history, dynamic SLAs, escalation workflows, health scoring, and built-in AI deflection. It positions itself between lightweight tools like Help Scout and heavyweight suites like Zendesk, with transparent per-agent pricing.

A particularly good fit for: B2B/SaaS support teams juggling complex account context, dynamic SLAs, and multi-level escalations Teams outgrowing a shared-inbox tool that need real ticketing plus health scoring Mid-market teams wanting per-agent pricing with AI features included at the base tier

May be a poor fit if: Teams under ~5 agents or under 500 tickets/month, where a basic shared inbox is cheaper and sufficient Teams needing a highly polished native mobile experience, since the mobile app lags the desktop app

Pricing and plan structure

Gladly: Published starting price Custom pricing

  • HeroCustom pricing
  • SuperheroCustom pricing

Supportbench: Published starting price $32 per agent/month

  • Professional$32 USD/agent/month (billed annually)
  • Enterprise$100 USD/agent/month (billed annually)

Capabilities worth validating

  • Gladly: AI features, Automation & macros, CSAT & satisfaction surveys, Knowledge base & help center, Live chat & messaging Integrations include Shopify, BigCommerce, Magento, Klaviyo.
  • Supportbench: Omnichannel support, Shared inbox & ticketing, Knowledge base & help center, Live chat & messaging, CSAT & satisfaction surveys Integrations include Salesforce, HubSpot, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Jira.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Gladly's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Supportbench's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Shopify, BigCommerce, Magento support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between Customer Support tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative Customer Support workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Shopify, BigCommerce, Magento: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Structured signals help narrow the shortlist, but a trial with a real workflow is still the best way to validate the decision.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-07-24. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Gladly product site, G2, Capterra; Supportbench product site, Capterra, G2