Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Whova

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Whova at $3,000.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Whovafrom $3,000 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong31AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetWhova is an all-in-one event management platform designed for organizing in-person, hybrid, and virtual events.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Event registration—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Agenda management—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Attendee networking—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Live announcements—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation tools—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Kiosk self check-in—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Crms—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—2+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Event registration
  • Documented capability: Agenda management
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Whova is perfect for event organizers who want to save time managing logistics and create better experiences for attendees. Trusted by Michigan Histor
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Whova ↗