Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Weezly

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Weezly at $29.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Weezlyfrom $29 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong31AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetWeezly is a sales platform designed to boost LinkedIn outreach with personalized AI videos and messaging.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$15
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Native LinkedIn inbox and CRMYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Personalized AI sales videosYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automated video outreach at scaleYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Embedded scheduling and bookingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Voice and video messagesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Sales pipeline managementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Video ProspectingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video OutreachYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video Creation ToolsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified2+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Native LinkedIn inbox and CRM
  • Documented capability: Personalized AI sales videos
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Weezly is recommended for sales pros, agencies, and teams using LinkedIn who want to automate outreach with personalized AI videos, schedule meetings
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Weezly ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Fathom

Fathom is an AI meeting notetaker that records, transcribes, and summarizes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, with searchable call history, AI-generated action items, and coaching scorecards on higher tiers.

A particularly good fit for: Individuals and teams wanting a strong free-forever meeting notetaker

May be a poor fit if: Teams needing deep sales conversation analytics beyond notetaking

Weezly

Weezly is a sales platform designed to boost LinkedIn outreach with personalized AI videos and messaging. It replaces the LinkedIn inbox and adds scheduling features in one unified tool. The main value is its ability to automate video outreach at scale, increasing response and booking rates significantly. The tool shines for sales teams, recruiters, and agencies needing to send many personal videos quickly and book meetings without leaving LinkedIn. You start seeing results fast—tripled conversion rates are reported shortly after use. Weezly fits as a LinkedIn inbox replacement with CRM and pipeline management built-in. It connects with your existing tools but isn’t meant for broad marketing automation or non-LinkedIn channels. It focuses on making LinkedIn outreach smarter and more efficient.

A particularly good fit for: recommended for sales pros, agencies, and teams using LinkedIn who want to automate outreach with personalized AI videos, schedule meetings easily, and organize Startups, SMBs teams with a defined revenue workflow ai video prospecting

May be a poor fit if: Teams looking for a single-purpose tool outside its documented go-to-market focus Teams that need unlimited usage without plan or credit limits

Pricing and plan structure

Fathom: Published starting price $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)

  • Team$15 per user/month

Weezly: Published starting price $29 per month

  • Free$15 per month
  • Basic$12 per month
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12 per month

Capabilities worth validating

  • Fathom: the record has no feature-level evidence yet; verify the workflow directly. Integrations include Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack.
  • Weezly: Native LinkedIn inbox and CRM, Personalized AI sales videos, Automated video outreach at scale, Embedded scheduling and booking, Voice and video messages Integrations include LinkedIn, API.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Fathom's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Weezly's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between Sales & CRM tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative Sales & CRM workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Some signals in these records are still incomplete. Treat that as a prompt to validate the workflow directly, not as a claim that a feature does not exist.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-08-26. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Fathom product site, G2, Capterra; Weezly product site, ColdIQ profile, Vendor website