Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Waterfall

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Waterfall at $149.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Waterfallfrom $149 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetWaterfall is a data enrichment API built for GTM and revenue teams to get accurate contact info from 30+ data sources in one place.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Track job changesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find verified emailsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find mobile numbersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Verify emails in real-timeYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Global contact coverageYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Usage-based pricingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Visitor IdentificationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Waterfall enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
SlackMakeLinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Track job changes
  • Documented capability: Find verified emails
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Waterfall is recommended for GTM and revenue leaders at top B2B companies who need one API to find prospects, verify emails, track job changes, and ge
  • Public profile names Slack, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Waterfall ↗