Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Viewed

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Viewed at $72.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Viewedfrom $72 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong33AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetViewed is a video-in-email tool designed to embed autoplay videos directly into email campaigns.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$42
  • Basic$372
  • ProfessionalCustom pricing
  • Business$8
Embed video in emailsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Autoplay video in inboxesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI video from imagesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Personalized data-driven videosYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Unlimited video hostingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time campaign analyticsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Video ProspectingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video OutreachYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified6+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
MakeLinkedInFacebookInstagramTwitterAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Embed video in emails
  • Documented capability: Autoplay video in inboxes
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Viewed is recommended for brands and marketers who want to boost engagement by embedding autoplay videos directly into emails, creating personalized v
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Pricing and usage limits should be rechecked before purchase
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Viewed ↗