Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Userlytics

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Userlytics at $34.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Userlyticsfrom $34 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetUserlytics is a UX research platform designed to test ideas and validate designs.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • Premium$34
  • Enterprise$15
Test ideas effectivelyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Validate designs easilyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Uncover hidden friction pointsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Access global user panelsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Receive expert supportYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Optimize digital experiencesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Live Data SourcesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified5+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInFacebookInstagramAirtableAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Test ideas effectively
  • Documented capability: Validate designs easily
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Userlytics is recommended for teams who want to test ideas, validate designs, and find hidden problems in digital experiences. It helps businesses get
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Userlytics ↗