Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Type

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Type starts at $12 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Typefrom $12 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetType.ai is an AI-powered editor made for long-form writing like books, essays, and reports.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$12
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • ProfessionalCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
Custom writing styles—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Deep AI integration—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Feature-rich editor—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Multimodal publishing—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Full offline capability—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Multiple export file types—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Copywriting—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Copywriting—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Content Writing—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—3+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInTwitterAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Custom writing styles
  • Documented capability: Deep AI integration
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Type is best for writers and teams who need to create, edit, and publish long documents like books, reports, or proposals faster and easier. Professio
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Twitter, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Type ↗