Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Tray

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Tray at $19.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Trayfrom $19 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetTray is an AI-ready integration platform designed to build and deploy AI agents easily.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
AI-ready integration platform—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Build and deploy agents—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Pre-built agent accelerators—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Low-code AI automation builder—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Secure AI data handling—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Scalable governance and compliance—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Api Connector Agents—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Checkout Optimization—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—5+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
SlackMakeLinkedInFacebookAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: AI-ready integration platform
  • Documented capability: Build and deploy agents
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Tray is perfect for teams that want to quickly build and use AI agents without complexity, especially if you work with Slack, web apps, or APIs. Compa
  • Public profile names Slack, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Tray ↗