Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Thatek

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Thatek at Custom pricing.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Thatekfrom Custom pricing
Audyense Score76AS*Strong15AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet​Master leadership with Thatek, the digital coach built by PhD experts in Management & Psychology.
Free tierYesNo
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Starting planCustom pricing
  • Higher tiersCustom pricing
Experienced Leadership TeamYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
Multidisciplinary ExpertiseYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
Technology-Focused VisionYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
Transparent Leadership PresentationYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
Global Perspective.YesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
Training & EducationYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
CareersYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
LeadersYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
Leadership GrowthYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
sales and CRMYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
Cloud applicationYesDocumented in the SaaSHub profile or its source category listing.
Integrations verified
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Public profile provides a named product summary
  • Documented capability: Experienced Leadership Team
  • Documented capability: Multidisciplinary Expertise
  • Documented capability: Technology-Focused Vision
  • Documented capability: Transparent Leadership Presentation
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Pricing and usage limits should be checked against the exact plan
  • Implementation effort depends on the team's data and process maturity
  • Reported outcomes should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Thatek ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Fathom

Fathom is an AI meeting notetaker that records, transcribes, and summarizes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, with searchable call history, AI-generated action items, and coaching scorecards on higher tiers.

A particularly good fit for: Individuals and teams wanting a strong free-forever meeting notetaker

May be a poor fit if: Teams needing deep sales conversation analytics beyond notetaking

Thatek

​Master leadership with Thatek, the digital coach built by PhD experts in Management & Psychology. Get science-backed assessments and daily tasks to grow into a capable leader. Trusted by 1M+ users, now globally available in English. The profile identifies capabilities including Experienced Leadership Team, Multidisciplinary Expertise, Technology-Focused Vision, Transparent Leadership Presentation, and Global Perspective.. It is categorized for Training & Education, Careers, Leaders workflows.

A particularly good fit for: B2B teams evaluating sales and CRM software Training & Education and Careers workflows Organizations willing to validate plan limits and implementation effort

May be a poor fit if: Teams seeking a workflow outside the product's documented focus Teams requiring a permanent free tier

Pricing and plan structure

Fathom: Published starting price $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)

  • Team$15 per user/month

Thatek: Published starting price Custom pricing

  • Starting planCustom pricing
  • Higher tiersCustom pricing

Capabilities worth validating

  • Fathom: the record has no feature-level evidence yet; verify the workflow directly. Integrations include Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack.
  • Thatek: Experienced Leadership Team, Multidisciplinary Expertise, Technology-Focused Vision, Transparent Leadership Presentation, Global Perspective.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Fathom's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Thatek's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between Sales & CRM tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative Sales & CRM workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Some signals in these records are still incomplete. Treat that as a prompt to validate the workflow directly, not as a claim that a feature does not exist.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-08-25. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Fathom product site, G2, Capterra; Thatek product site, SaaSHub product profile, SaaSHub category listing