Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. TextQL

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus TextQL at $250.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
TextQLfrom $250 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetTextQL is a data analysis tool designed to simplify complex data queries.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$250
  • Growth$49
  • BusinessCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
Ask data questions naturally—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrate any data source—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Schedule always-on analysis—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Create instant dashboards—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Use best-in-class semantic layer—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Deploy autonomous analytics agents—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Enterprise Ai Agents—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Deep Customer Analytics Software—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
SlackLinkedInSnowflakeAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Ask data questions naturally
  • Documented capability: Integrate any data source
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: TextQL is for businesses that want fast, trusted AI answers from all their data sources. It helps teams quickly analyze data and get clear insights wi
  • Public profile names Slack, LinkedIn, Snowflake as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit TextQL ↗