Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Sonnet

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Sonnet at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Sonnetfrom $15 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetSonnet AI is a smart notetaking tool designed for capturing and organizing meeting conversations.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$10
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • Enterprise$15
  • Pro$20
Context-rich conversation insightsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Customizable notes and templatesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Meeting participant background infoYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automated CRM data integrationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Shareable recordings and summariesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Multilingual support and adaptabilityYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Conversation intelligenceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI meeting notesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Meeting RecordersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInTwitterAPIChrome extension
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Context-rich conversation insights
  • Documented capability: Customizable notes and templates
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Sonnet AI is recommended for professionals who need context-rich, customizable notes from every conversation, like Richard Hendricks from Pied Piper.
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Twitter, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Pricing and usage limits should be rechecked before purchase
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Sonnet ↗