Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. SlideCamp

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus SlideCamp at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
SlideCampfrom $15 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong31AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetSlideCamp is a slide library tool built to simplify presentation creation and management directly inside PowerPoint.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$15
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Built into PowerPoint—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Search inside slides—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
1-click slide updates—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time alerts—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Stay on brand—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Faster deck creation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Demo—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Proposals—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—2+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Built into PowerPoint
  • Documented capability: Search inside slides
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: SlideCamp is perfect for teams who want to create presentations faster and stay on brand. NewEdge Capital Group loves using it because it works direct
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit SlideCamp ↗