Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Quicklizard

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Quicklizard at $399.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Quicklizardfrom $399 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong31AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetQuicklizard automates dynamic pricing using AI by integrating sales, competitor data, and inventory to optimize prices and boost revenue efficiently.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
AI-powered dynamic pricing platform—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Optimizes pricing at scale—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Maximizes revenue and profit—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrates with ERP and CRM—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Tracks competitor pricing—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Forecasts demand and trends—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Pricing Optimization—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Revenue Optimization Software—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—2+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: AI-powered dynamic pricing platform
  • Documented capability: Optimizes pricing at scale
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Quicklizard is recommended for retailers and brands who want to increase revenue and profit by using AI-powered dynamic
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Quicklizard ↗