Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Pipedream

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Pipedream at $29.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Pipedreamfrom $29 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetPipedream is a low-code automation platform designed to help developers quickly build and run workflows connecting different apps and APIs.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$29
  • Basic$29
  • Premium$2
  • Business$29
PromptYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
runYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
and deploy AI agentsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Add 2YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
800+ APIs easilyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Managed authentication across appsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Built-in queue and data storesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
One-click private networksYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Security and privacy focusedYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
ZapierMakeLinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Prompt
  • Documented capability: run
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Pipedream is recommended for developers who want to quickly automate workflows by connecting APIs and building AI agents. It’s trusted by startups and
  • Public profile names Zapier, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Pipedream ↗