Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Pega

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Pega at $149.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Pegafrom $149 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong33AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetPega is an AI-powered platform designed for enterprise transformation.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
AI-powered enterprise transformation platform—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automate workflows—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Personalize customer engagement—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Modernize legacy systems—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Design agents for innovation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Streamline operations—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreach—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account research—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—6+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
MakeLinkedInFacebookTwitterAirtableAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: AI-powered enterprise transformation platform
  • Documented capability: Automate workflows
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Pega is recommended for organizations that want to automate workflows, personalize customer experiences, and modernize legacy systems. Companies like
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Pega ↗