Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. OpenRouter

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

OpenRouter starts at $0 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
OpenRouterfrom $0 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong31AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetOpenRouter is a unified interface for accessing large language models (LLMs).
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
Unified API for all modelsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Reliable AI via distributed infrastructureYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Better prices with no subscriptionsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Minimal latency at the edgeYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Custom data protection policiesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
OpenAI SDK works out of boxYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai ModelsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Social ListeningYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified2+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Unified API for all models
  • Documented capability: Reliable AI via distributed infrastructure
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: OpenRouter is recommended for developers and teams who want one API to access all major AI models easily, with better prices, reliable uptime, and no
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit OpenRouter ↗