Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Okappy

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Okappy at $29.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Okappyfrom $29 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetOkappy is a field service management platform designed to help contractors, suppliers, and subcontractors manage jobs in real time.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$29
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • GrowthCustom pricing
  • Business$9
Manage subcontractors and employeesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
See live and completed jobsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Add photosYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
imagesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
signaturesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Share job statuses with customersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Raise invoices quicklyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrates with other platformsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified5+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
HubSpotLinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Manage subcontractors and employees
  • Documented capability: See live and completed jobs
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Okappy is perfect for contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers who want to manage field service projects easily and in real-time. It helps increase
  • Public profile names HubSpot, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Pricing and usage limits should be rechecked before purchase
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Okappy ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Fathom

Fathom is an AI meeting notetaker that records, transcribes, and summarizes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, with searchable call history, AI-generated action items, and coaching scorecards on higher tiers.

A particularly good fit for: Individuals and teams wanting a strong free-forever meeting notetaker

May be a poor fit if: Teams needing deep sales conversation analytics beyond notetaking

Okappy

Okappy is a field service management platform designed to help contractors, suppliers, and subcontractors manage jobs in real time. It fits in the category of workforce and project management tools, focusing on improving efficiency and communication. What sets Okappy apart is its unique networked system that shows every live and completed project on one platform, saving time and reducing mistakes. The tool shines in industries like facilities management, fire and security, drainage, HVAC, and pest control. Users can connect teams, assign work, track updates, share job statuses with customers, and raise invoices quickly. Results come fast since it simplifies job management from day one, helping businesses improve customer service and get paid faster. Okappy integrates smoothly with other software systems, allowing users to view all operations through a single screen and login. It’s not designed to replace heavy ERP or accounting systems but works best as a specialized field service and subcontractor management tool. If you want faster job handling, less admin, and better control over subcontractors, Okappy delivers that simply and effectively.

A particularly good fit for: perfect for contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers who want to manage field service projects easily and in real-time. It helps increase efficiency, improve SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise teams with a defined revenue workflow community building platforms

May be a poor fit if: Teams needing replace heavy ERP or accounting systems but works best as a specialized field service and subcontractor management tool Teams that need unlimited usage without plan or credit limits

Pricing and plan structure

Fathom: Published starting price $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)

  • Team$15 per user/month

Okappy: Published starting price $29 per month

  • Free$29 per user/month
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • GrowthCustom pricing
  • Business$9 per month

Capabilities worth validating

  • Fathom: the record has no feature-level evidence yet; verify the workflow directly. Integrations include Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack.
  • Okappy: Manage subcontractors and employees, See live and completed jobs, Add photos, images, signatures Integrations include HubSpot, LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Fathom's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Okappy's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between Sales & CRM tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative Sales & CRM workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Some signals in these records are still incomplete. Treat that as a prompt to validate the workflow directly, not as a claim that a feature does not exist.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-08-25. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Fathom product site, G2, Capterra; Okappy product site, ColdIQ profile, Vendor website