Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Octave

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Octave at $119.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Octavefrom $119 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetOctave is a generative GTM tool designed to boost outbound sales and marketing.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$119
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • GrowthCustom pricing
  • Premium$119
Real-time context engineYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
ICP tailored messagingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI agents research leadsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Composable workflows integrationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Hyper-targeted personalized campaignsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Continuous market adaptationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI agentsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Sales WorkflowYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified3+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
SlackLinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Real-time context engine
  • Documented capability: ICP tailored messaging
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Octave is recommended for GTM teams who want to create personalized, relevant outbound campaigns quickly. It helps sales and marketing teams like Engi
  • Public profile names Slack, LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Octave ↗