Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Nylas

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Nylas starts at $5 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Nylasfrom $5 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetNylas is a developer-first API platform designed to simplify integration with email, calendar, contacts, and meeting providers.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • BusinessCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
Integrate email—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
calendar—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
meetings—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Send email on behalf of user—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Manage calendars and events—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Create and sync contacts—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Embed scheduler component—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Invite AI notetaker to meetings—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreach—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
GmailLinkedInTwitterAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Integrate email
  • Documented capability: calendar
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Nylas is recommended for developers who want to quickly integrate email, calendar, and meetings from providers like Gmail and Microsoft into their app
  • Public profile names Gmail, LinkedIn, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Nylas ↗