Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. nRev

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus nRev at $149.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
nRevfrom $149 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetnRev AI is a powerful AI tool designed for GTM (Go-To-Market) teams and RevOps leaders.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
Autonomous GTM AI engineer—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find leads matching ICP—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automate outreach and engagement—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Enrich and score leads instantly—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Track competitor launches and alerts—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Keep CRM clean and optimized—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find leads—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—5+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
CloseZapierMakeLinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Autonomous GTM AI engineer
  • Documented capability: Find leads matching ICP
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: nRev AI is recommended for RevOps teams and GTM leaders who want to automate workflows and unify GTM data without needing developers. Companies like M
  • Public profile names Close, Zapier, Make as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit nRev ↗