Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Magical

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Magical starts at $6 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Magicalfrom $6 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong33AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetMagical is an AI-powered automation tool designed to simplify and speed up complex workflows across industries.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
No-build automationsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Connect any appYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Text expanderYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AutofillYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Auto form fillerYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Fully autonomous AI workforceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Sales AssistantYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified6+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
ZapierLinkedInFacebookInstagramTwitterAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: No-build automations
  • Documented capability: Connect any app
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Magical AI is recommended for teams facing budget cuts and headcount freezes who want to automate time-consuming workflows quickly and flawlessly. It’
  • Public profile names Zapier, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Magical ↗