Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Lingo

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Lingo at $80.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Lingofrom $80 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong33AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetLingo is a digital asset management tool designed to organize and centralize brand assets in one easy place.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$80
  • Basic$160
  • Starter$160
  • OrganizationCustom pricing
Centralized brand assetsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Organized drag-and-drop editorYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Dynamic brand essentials updatesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Secure sharing with permissionsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time asset usage insightsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automatic file format optimizationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Contact Syncing & Crm IntegrationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified8+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
SalesforceHubSpotPipedriveMakeLinkedInFacebook+2 more
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Centralized brand assets
  • Documented capability: Organized drag-and-drop editor
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Lingo is recommended for teams that want to keep their brand assets organized, on-brand, and easy to share. It helps design teams, agencies, and busin
  • Public profile names Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Pricing and usage limits should be rechecked before purchase
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Lingo ↗