Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Jenkins

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Jenkins starts at $11 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Jenkinsfrom $11 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetJenkins is an open-source automation server designed for building, deploying, and automating any project.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
BuildYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
deployYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
and automate projectsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Easy installation on multiple platformsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Simple web-based configuration interfaceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Hundreds of integration pluginsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Extendable via plugin architectureYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Distribute work across machinesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified3+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
MakeLinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Build
  • Documented capability: deploy
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Jenkins is recommended for developers and teams who want to build, deploy, and automate projects easily at any scale. It works well on Windows, Linux,
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Jenkins ↗