Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Introhive

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Introhive at $49.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Introhivefrom $49 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetIntrohive is a Relationship Intelligence platform designed for sales-driven B2B firms.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
Activate relationships—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Foster collaboration—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Drive growth—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automate data entry—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ensure data accuracy—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Monitor job changes—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Lead Management—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Activate relationships
  • Documented capability: Foster collaboration
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Introhive is recommended for sales-focused B2B firms like legal, accounting, and consulting that want to turn their client data into actionable Relati
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Introhive ↗
Fathom vs. Introhive · Audyense