Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Gyaan

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Gyaan at $19.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Gyaanfrom $19 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong33AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetMaxIQ is an AI platform designed for sales and customer success teams to improve forecasting, pipeline management, and post-sales growth.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$19
  • Basic$20
  • Starter$20
  • GrowthCustom pricing
AI-powered forecasting for pipeline—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Total pipeline visibility—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time reporting flexibility—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Unified customer journey data—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Collaborative notes and task management—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Seamless tech stack integration—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreach—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Crms—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—7+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
SalesforceSlackLinkedInFacebookInstagramSnowflake+1 more
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: AI-powered forecasting for pipeline
  • Documented capability: Total pipeline visibility
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: MaxIQ is recommended for go-to-market teams at companies like Superna, Snowflake, and Commvault who want to forecast revenue accurately, track pipelin
  • Public profile names Salesforce, Slack, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Gyaan ↗