Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Guusto

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Guusto at $150.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Guustofrom $150 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetGuusto is employee recognition and reward software designed for HR and operations leaders.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$150
  • Basic$150
  • Premium$200
  • Enterprise$3
Employee recognition programsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Flexible global gift cardsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Frontline employee engagementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time program insightsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Scalable peer-to-peer rewardsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Powerful budget controlsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
DemoYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Retention & Loyalty ToolsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified3+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInFacebookAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Employee recognition programs
  • Documented capability: Flexible global gift cards
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Guusto is recommended for HR and Operations leaders who want to build recognition programs that engage employees from the head office to frontline wor
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Facebook, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Guusto ↗