Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Gradual

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Gradual at $35,000.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Gradualfrom $35,000 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong31AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetGradual is a sales training tool designed to help teams learn faster and sell better.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
Personalised microlearning trainingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Sales library and own materialsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrate sales tools easilyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Reinforce knowledge with tasksYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Scalable training processesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Interactive quizzes and assessmentsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Sales engagementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Sales coachingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified2+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Personalised microlearning training
  • Documented capability: Sales library and own materials
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Gradual is recommended for sales teams who want personalised microlearning to level up their skills fast. It’s great for small to mid-sized businesses
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Gradual ↗