Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Goodmeetings

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Goodmeetings starts at $14 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Goodmeetingsfrom $14 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetGoodmeetings is an AI-powered platform designed to boost sales team performance by automating meeting tasks.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$10
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • StarterFree
  • ProfessionalCustom pricing
Capture meeting intelYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Call recordingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI-generated key momentsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Human-level summariesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Deep CRM integrationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time natural language queriesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Conversation intelligenceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI meeting notesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Meeting RecordersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
CloseLinkedInTwitterAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Capture meeting intel
  • Documented capability: Call recording
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Goodmeetings is recommended for sales teams and reps who want to supercharge productivity, close deals faster, and remove mundane tasks. It’s ideal fo
  • Public profile names Close, LinkedIn, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Goodmeetings ↗