Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. GoodFit

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus GoodFit at $149.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
GoodFitfrom $149 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetGoodFit is a data platform designed for go-to-market (GTM) strategy teams.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
Configurable data platform—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Map and enrich market—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Prioritize and segment accounts—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Build custom classification models—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Discover technographics and funding—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automate and orchestrate engagement—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automation—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account research—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Technology Lookup—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—3+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
CloseLinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Configurable data platform
  • Documented capability: Map and enrich market
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: . It delivers value by allowing users to map their market, discover relevant contacts, and integrate data into existing tools for targeted outreach an
  • Public profile names Close, LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, Mid-market audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit GoodFit ↗