Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Geneva

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Geneva starts at Free per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Genevafrom Free
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetGeneva is an online platform designed to help people find and join local communities easily.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Growth$1
Find natural explorers nearbyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Join the online placeYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Connect with offline peopleYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Access town rulesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Visit help centerYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Follow on social mediaYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Audience targetingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Network Growth/engagementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai All In One ProspectingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
MakeLinkedInFacebookAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Find natural explorers nearby
  • Documented capability: Join the online place
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Geneva is recommended for natural explorers who want to find their offline people easily. It’s perfect for anyone in places like Los Angeles looking t
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Geneva ↗