Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Forter

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Forter starts at $0 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Forterfrom $0 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong32AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetForter is a smart AI tool designed for fraud management and payment optimization in online commerce.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
AI-powered fraud management—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Payment flow orchestration—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Agentic commerce support—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time decisioning insights—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Identity and issuer intelligence—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automated AI-native integrations—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Fraud Detection & Prevention—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Payment Management Software—YesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified—4+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
MakeLinkedInInstagramAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: AI-powered fraud management
  • Documented capability: Payment flow orchestration
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Forter is recommended for businesses like Wayfair, Instacart, and Adidas that want to grow by blocking fraud, optimizing payments, and supporting agen
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, Instagram as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Forter ↗