Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Fathom vs. Fluint

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fluint starts at $0 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Fluintfrom $0 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Strong33AS*Low
PositioningFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetFluint is a sales execution platform built for complex B2B sales.
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Team$15
  • Free$0
  • Basic$0
  • GrowthCustom pricing
  • Professional$15
Tailored executive business casesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI-guided deal executionYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Multi-threaded buyer engagementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Auto-updating living documentsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Shareable trackable collaborationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
CRM and sales tool integrationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Conversation intelligenceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai ProposalYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
ProposalsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified6+
Aggregate rating5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
SalesforceHubSpotCloseZapierLinkedInAPI
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Tailored executive business cases
  • Documented capability: AI-guided deal execution
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Fluint is recommended for Account Executives and Sales Leaders at B2B SaaS and services firms working on complex deals with multiple buying personas o
  • Public profile names Salesforce, HubSpot, Close as connected workflow surfaces
Cons
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit Fathom ↗Visit Fluint ↗