Audyense·
Add your product
Side-by-side record

Emplay vs. Fathom

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Emplay at $19.

Full comparison

Emplayfrom $19 per month
Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score32AS*Low76AS*Strong
PositioningZinger by Emplay is an AI-powered platform designed to build, train, and manage conversational AI agents quickly.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitMid-market, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
  • Team$15
Hire train and manage AI agentsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Pre-built agents for sales marketingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Configurable low-code no-code toolsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Meta agents build agentic workflowsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Manage optimize outcomes day oneYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Autonomous agents boost team productivityYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Conversation intelligenceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Account researchYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
AI sales coachingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Integrations verified4+—
Aggregate rating— · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integrations
MakeLinkedInTwitterAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Security & compliance—
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Hire train and manage AI agents
  • Documented capability: Pre-built agents for sales marketing
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Zinger is recommended for businesses that want to hire, train, and manage AI agents to automate sales, marketing, support, and procurement tasks. Fort
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Cons
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visit Emplay ↗Visit Fathom ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Emplay

Zinger by Emplay is an AI-powered platform designed to build, train, and manage conversational AI agents quickly. It fits in the enterprise automation category, focusing on sales, marketing, procurement, and customer support. Users choose it for its pre-built, configurable agents that automate up to 60% of tasks, boosting productivity and outcomes from day one with minimal team effort. The tool works best in sales, marketing, customer support, and complex workflow automation, where fast deployment is critical. You can build and scale autonomous agents in minutes, so the time-to-value is very short, helping teams double their efficiency and improve conversion rates swiftly. Zinger integrates easily with your Go-To-Market tech stack, complementing CRM, support, and marketing systems by handling support tickets, content generation, and task automation. However, it is not designed for general-purpose AI or deep technical data analysis, focusing instead on agentic task automation and business user accessibility through low-code/no-code tools. ▶ Video Review Coming Soon We're working on creating a detailed video review for Emplay .

A particularly good fit for: recommended for businesses that want to hire, train, and manage AI agents to automate sales, marketing, support, and procurement tasks. Fortune 500 companies ch Mid-market, Enterprise teams with a defined revenue workflow ai sales coaching

May be a poor fit if: Teams looking for a single-purpose tool outside its documented go-to-market focus Teams that need unlimited usage without plan or credit limits

Fathom

Fathom is an AI meeting notetaker that records, transcribes, and summarizes calls across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, with searchable call history, AI-generated action items, and coaching scorecards on higher tiers.

A particularly good fit for: Individuals and teams wanting a strong free-forever meeting notetaker

May be a poor fit if: Teams needing deep sales conversation analytics beyond notetaking

Pricing and plan structure

Emplay: Published starting price $19 per month

  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12 per month
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12 per month

Fathom: Published starting price $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)

  • Team$15 per user/month

Capabilities worth validating

  • Emplay: Hire train and manage AI agents, Pre-built agents for sales marketing, Configurable low-code no-code tools, Meta agents build agentic workflows, Manage optimize outcomes day one Integrations include Make, LinkedIn, Twitter, API.
  • Fathom: the record has no feature-level evidence yet; verify the workflow directly. Integrations include Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Slack.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Emplay's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Fathom's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Make, LinkedIn, Twitter support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between Sales & CRM tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative Sales & CRM workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Make, LinkedIn, Twitter: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Some signals in these records are still incomplete. Treat that as a prompt to validate the workflow directly, not as a claim that a feature does not exist.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-08-25. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Emplay product site, ColdIQ profile, Vendor website; Fathom product site, G2, Capterra