Audyense·
Side-by-side record

emaze vs. Fathom

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

emaze starts at $9 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

emazefrom $9 per month
Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score32AS*Low76AS*Strong
PositioningEmaze is a content creation tool designed for making presentations, websites, blogs, and more quickly.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-market, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • Free$1
  • Basic$9
  • ProfessionalCustom pricing
  • PremiumCustom pricing
  • Team$15
Professionally designed templatesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI-powered content creationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Custom dashboards and analyticsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Collaboration tools includedYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Digital asset managementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Tailored solutions for industriesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
ProposalsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai CopywritingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Content WritingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integrations
CloseMakeLinkedInAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Professionally designed templates
  • Documented capability: AI-powered content creation
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Emaze is perfect for marketers, teachers, and anyone who wants to create high-quality content quickly using AI and ready-made templates. It helps you
  • Public profile names Close, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Cons
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visit emaze ↗Visit Fathom ↗