Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Edward vs. Fathom

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Edward starts at $5 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Edwardfrom $5 per month
Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score31AS*Low76AS*Strong
PositioningEdward.ai is an AI-powered sales assistant designed to help sales teams automate and improve their sales process.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-market, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
  • Team$15
Lead distribution to smartphonesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automatic reporting to managersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Tasks delegation in groupsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
CRM integration for accuracyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Sales process automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Follow-up reporting monitoringYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreachYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Sales engagementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified2+
Aggregate rating · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integrations
LinkedInAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Lead distribution to smartphones
  • Documented capability: Automatic reporting to managers
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Edward is recommended for sales teams and sales reps who want to automate their sales process and improve effectiveness. It helps manage leads, follow
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Cons
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visit Edward ↗Visit Fathom ↗