Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Dacast vs. Fathom

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Dacast at $39.

Full comparison

Dacastfrom $39 per month
Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score32AS*Low76AS*Strong
PositioningDacast is a live streaming and video hosting platform designed for businesses and organizations.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitSMB, Mid-market, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • Free$39
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • Starter$39
  • Professional$36
  • Team$15
Secure video hostingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video monetizationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Live event streamingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
VOD managementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
OTT platformYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
24/7 customer supportYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Customer ServiceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Content Creation ToolsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integrations
LinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Secure video hosting
  • Documented capability: Video monetization
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Dacast is perfect for businesses and organizations that want to host, monetize, and broadcast live video securely. It works well for enterprises, spor
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Cons
  • Pricing and usage limits should be rechecked before purchase
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visit Dacast ↗Visit Fathom ↗