Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Coauthor vs. Fathom

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Coauthor starts at $9 per seat, versus Fathom at $15.

Full comparison

Coauthorfrom $9 per month
Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score32AS*Low76AS*Strong
PositioningCoauthor is an AI writing assistant designed for busy professionals to create personalized LinkedIn posts and daily ideas.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-marketStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • FreeFree
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • Growth$15
  • ProfessionalCustom pricing
  • Team$15
Personalized voice learningYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Daily tailored ideasYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI-assisted editsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Fact-checked postsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Custom images suggestedYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Private content approvalYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Linkedin Growth BotsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Writing AssistantsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Social Media AutomationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified3+
Aggregate rating · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integrations
MakeLinkedInAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Personalized voice learning
  • Documented capability: Daily tailored ideas
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Coauthor is recommended for busy professionals who want to share their ideas and build influence without spending hours writing. It’s ideal for founde
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Cons
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visit Coauthor ↗Visit Fathom ↗