Audyense·
Add your product
Skip to content
Side-by-side record

Cloudways vs. Spacelift

A side-by-side view of the product records we have today. Use it to narrow the question, then confirm current pricing, limits, and security details with each vendor.

The short version

Spacelift starts at Free per seat, versus Cloudways at $11. Spacelift carries the higher aggregate rating (4.9/5 vs 4.7/5). Cloudways lists more integrations (50+ vs 28+).

Full comparison

Cloudwaysfrom $11 per month (Flexible Micro/Small)
Spaceliftfrom Free
Audyense Score81ASStrong69ASFair
PositioningManaged cloud hosting for web applications, WordPress, and e-commerce with enterprise features at SMB pricesIaC orchestration and CI/CD for Terraform, OpenTofu & more
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS, On-premise
Best fitStartup, SMB, Mid-market, EnterpriseMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Basic$10
  • Growth$30
  • Scale$80
  • FreeFree
  • Starter +$20,000
  • BusinessCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • Enterprise +Custom pricing
AI features—NoNot a core focus of the platform
Alerting & on-call—NoSends notifications via Slack/Teams but is not an alerting/on-call tool
Application performance monitoring (APM)—NoNot an APM tool; IaC orchestration focused
CI/CD pipelines—YesCore capability: IaC CI/CD orchestration with PR-native plan/apply workflows
Distributed tracing—NoNot offered
Incident management—NoNot offered
Infrastructure monitoring—PartialContinuous drift detection on infrastructure state, not metrics-based infra monitoring
Log management—NoSurfaces run/plan/apply logs on PRs but is not a log-management platform
Public API—YesGraphQL API, webhooks, and a Terraform provider to manage Spacelift as code
Self-hosting / on-prem—YesSelf-hosted/private workers plus on-prem and air-gapped deployment on Enterprise +
Integrations verified50+28+
Aggregate rating4.7 · 900 reviews4.9 · 12 reviews
Integrations
DigitalOceanAWSGoogle CloudVultrLinode
TerraformOpenTofuTerragruntPulumiCloudFormationAnsible+14 more
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPR CompliantPCI DSSHIPAA Ready
SOC 2 Type IIFedRAMP
Pros
  • Choice of 5 underlying cloud providers with dozens of regions
  • 24/7 support consistently praised by reviewers
  • Free SSL, staging environments, and Object Cache Pro included on all plans
  • Policy-as-code engine (OPA/Rego) gives fine-grained control over who can plan/approve/apply infrastructure changes
  • Thorough documentation with working examples that reduce need for support tickets
  • Solid automation surface: GraphQL API, webhooks, and a Terraform provider to manage Spacelift itself as code
  • Terraform plan/apply logs are surfaced directly on the pull request
Cons
  • Autonomous (fully managed WordPress) tier starts much higher at $99/month
  • No credit card required for trial, but trial is short (3 days) on Autonomous plans
  • Learning curve around core concepts like contexts and stacks during onboarding
  • Writing OPA/Rego policies is not beginner-friendly and policy-failure error messages can be unclear
  • Per-worker / concurrency-based pricing can become expensive as parallel run needs grow
  • Entry paid tier (~$20k/year) is a steep step up from the limited free plan
Visit Cloudways ↗Visit Spacelift ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Cloudways

Cloudways is a managed Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) that abstracts away infrastructure complexity. It combines AWS, Google Cloud, DigitalOcean, and Vultr backends with an intuitive control panel. Perfect for agencies, freelancers, and teams who want cloud reliability without DevOps expertise. Deploy apps in seconds with 1-click installers for 100+ frameworks and CMS platforms. Features include automated daily backups, real-time monitoring, integrated staging environments, advanced security (2FA, Web Application Firewall), SSL certificates, and dedicated 24/7 expert support. Pricing is transparent and transparent per application, with no hidden fees.

A particularly good fit for: Agencies and developers wanting managed multi-cloud hosting without a DevOps team

May be a poor fit if: Users wanting a single flat-rate all-inclusive hosting price with no cloud-provider choice

Spacelift

Spacelift is an infrastructure-as-code management and CI/CD orchestration platform for Terraform, OpenTofu, Terragrunt, Pulumi, CloudFormation, Ansible, and Kubernetes. It adds policy-as-code governance (OPA/Rego), drift detection, self-hosted private workers, and pull-request-native plan/apply workflows on top of existing IaC. It targets teams that need governance, auditability, and scale beyond open-source PR automation tools.

A particularly good fit for: Platform/DevOps teams standardizing multi-tool IaC CI/CD across many repos and stacks Organizations needing policy-as-code governance, approval controls, and audit trails over Terraform/OpenTofu changes Regulated or enterprise environments requiring self-hosted/private workers, SSO/SAML, or FedRAMP/air-gapped deployment

May be a poor fit if: Small teams or individuals wanting a free or low-cost tool, given the ~$20k/year entry paid tier Teams wanting a general-purpose observability/monitoring or on-call stack (Spacelift is IaC-focused, not APM/logging)

Pricing and plan structure

Cloudways: Published starting price $11 per month (Flexible Micro/Small)

  • Basic$10 month
  • Growth$30 month
  • Scale$80 month

Spacelift: Published starting price Free

  • FreeFree
  • Starter +$20,000 per year (flat)
  • BusinessCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • Enterprise +Custom pricing

Capabilities worth validating

  • Cloudways: the record has no feature-level evidence yet; verify the workflow directly. Integrations include DigitalOcean, AWS, Google Cloud, Vultr.
  • Spacelift: CI/CD pipelines, Infrastructure monitoring, Public API, Self-hosting / on-prem Integrations include Terraform, OpenTofu, Terragrunt, Pulumi.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Cloudways's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Spacelift's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for DigitalOcean, AWS, Google Cloud support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Will the deployment and data-residency model meet our security and procurement requirements?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between DevOps tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative DevOps workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through DigitalOcean, AWS, Google Cloud: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Some signals in these records are still incomplete. Treat that as a prompt to validate the workflow directly, not as a claim that a feature does not exist.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-08-05. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Cloudways product site, G2, Capterra; Spacelift product site, G2, PeerSpot