Audyense·
Skip to content
Side-by-side record

Close vs. Planhat

A side-by-side view of the product records we have today. Use it to narrow the question, then confirm current pricing, limits, and security details with each vendor.

The short version

Close starts at $9 per seat, versus Planhat at Custom pricing. Close carries the higher aggregate rating (4.7/5 vs 4.5/5). Close lists more integrations (80+ vs 19+).

Full comparison

Closefrom $9 per user / month
Planhatfrom Custom pricing
Audyense Score79ASStrong66ASFair
PositioningBuilt-in calling and email sequencing for inside-sales teams.A customer platform that unifies account data, health scoring, and workflow automation for B2B customer success and account management teams.
Free tierNoNo
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMBSMB, Mid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • Solo$9
  • Essentials$35
  • Growth$99
  • Scale$139
  • PlanhatCustom pricing
Custom objectsNoYesHighly flexible, custom data model is a repeatedly cited strength in reviews.
Workflow automationYesYesPlaybook-based automation is a headline feature and consistently praised in reviews.
AI featuresPartialAI-assisted email draftsYesRepositioned around ‘agentic’ AI (automated touchpoint capture, AI-driven playbooks, MCP integration).
Native callingYesBuilt-in dialerNoNo native dialer; integrates with third-party calling tools (Aircall, Ringover, Gong) instead.
Public APIYesYesOpen API access included across plans plus a documented developer portal.
Email & calendar syncYesYesNative email and calendar integration included on all plans.
Reporting & dashboardsPartialPipeline analytics exist, BI is limitedPartialCustomizable dashboards are core, but reviewers flag reporting/analytics as less polished than dedicated BI tools.
Mobile appYesIncluded on all pricing tiersNoNo evidence of a dedicated native mobile app; product appears web-only.
Lead scoringPartialVia custom fields/Smart Views/ZapierNoScoring engine is built for customer health/churn-risk, not top-of-funnel lead scoring.
Sales forecastingYesExpected Revenue ViewsPartialCRM module includes revenue/pipeline tracking, but this is a newer addition layered onto a CS-first platform.
Integrations verified80+19+
Aggregate rating4.7 · 620 reviews4.5 · 953 reviews
Integrations
ZapierHubSpotZoomGmailGoogle CalendarMicrosoft 365+6 more
SalesforceHubSpotPipedriveZendeskFreshdeskIntercom+13 more
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPA
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRCCPA
Pros
  • Ease of use and a clean UI, one of the most cited strengths in reviews.
  • Built-in calling and email in one tool — no extra VoIP integration needed.
  • All-in-one workflow (calls, email, SMS, pipeline) reduces tool-switching.
  • Responsive, helpful customer support.
  • Clean, well-designed, highly customizable interface — users can lay out dashboards and views to match their own workflow
  • Strong 360-degree customer view with dynamic health scoring that makes it easy to spot renewal/churn risk
  • Powerful playbook/workflow automation that saves CSMs manual work
  • Responsive, knowledgeable customer support called out repeatedly across review platforms
Cons
  • Reporting and analytics feel limited for deeper customization versus enterprise CRMs.
  • Learning curve for teams new to sales-engagement tools.
  • Pricier than competitors once dialer/call-minute add-ons are factored in.
  • Linking emails to specific deals and file uploads is limited.
  • Real learning curve for advanced features — building filters, triggers, and complex workflows often requires a dedicated technical admin
  • Reporting and analytics module is less polished than dedicated BI or reporting-only tools
  • CRM sync/integration setup described by some users as unintuitive and fiddly to manage
  • Fully custom, quote-only pricing with no public numbers makes it hard to budget or comparison-shop up front
Visit Close ↗Visit Planhat ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Close

Close bundles a dialer, SMS, and email sequencing directly into the CRM so an inside-sales rep can start calling on day one without wiring up separate tools. The tradeoff is fewer administrative and reporting features than platform-scale CRMs.

A particularly good fit for: Small-to-mid-size, high-velocity outbound and inside sales teams (calling and email heavy). Solo founders or small teams wanting an all-in-one, easy-to-adopt sales CRM. Teams that want native calling and SMS without stitching together separate VoIP tools.

May be a poor fit if: Enterprises needing deep custom reporting/BI or complex multi-department CRM workflows. Teams needing heavy multi-channel orchestration beyond call, email, and SMS.

Planhat

Planhat is a customer platform that centralizes account, usage, and revenue data into a single customer view, with dynamic health scoring, playbook automation, and dashboards built for customer success and account management teams. It positions itself as an alternative to point CS tools by also offering CRM and professional-services-automation modules on one data model, with an open API and deep customization.

A particularly good fit for: Customer success and account management teams that need a single system of record for account health, usage, and renewal risk Mid-market to enterprise B2B SaaS companies with a dedicated CS/RevOps function willing to invest time in configuration Organizations that want CS, light CRM, and professional-services automation on one underlying data model

May be a poor fit if: Very small teams or solo founders who want a low-cost, self-serve tool with transparent per-seat pricing Teams that need best-in-class native reporting/BI or heavy outbound sales-calling functionality out of the box

Pricing and plan structure

Close: Published starting price $9 per user / month

  • Solo$9 per user / month
  • Essentials$35 per user / month
  • Growth$99 per user / month
  • Scale$139 per user / month

Planhat: Published starting price Custom pricing

  • PlanhatCustom pricing

Capabilities worth validating

  • Close: Workflow automation, AI features, Native calling, Public API, Email & calendar sync Integrations include Zapier, HubSpot, Zoom, Gmail.
  • Planhat: AI features, Custom objects, Email & calendar sync, Public API, Reporting & dashboards Integrations include Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zendesk.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Close's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Planhat's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Zapier, HubSpot, Zoom support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between Sales & CRM tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative Sales & CRM workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Zapier, HubSpot, Zoom: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Structured signals help narrow the shortlist, but a trial with a real workflow is still the best way to validate the decision.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-07-31. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Close product site, G2; Planhat product site, G2, Capterra