Skip to content
Side-by-side record

Close vs. Pipedrive

A side-by-side view of the product records we have today. Use it to narrow the question, then confirm current pricing, limits, and security details with each vendor.

The short version

Close starts at $9 per seat, versus Pipedrive at $14. Close carries the higher aggregate rating (4.7/5 vs 4.5/5). Pipedrive lists more integrations (400+ vs 80+).

Full comparison

Closefrom $9 per user / month
Pipedrivefrom $14 per user / month
Audyense Score79ASStrong82ASStrong
PositioningBuilt-in calling and email sequencing for inside-sales teams.Pipeline-first CRM built around visual deal stages.
Free tierNoNo
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMBStartup, SMB
Pricing plans
  • Solo$9
  • Essentials$35
  • Growth$99
  • Scale$139
  • Lite$14
  • Growth$39
  • Premium$49
  • Ultimate$79
Custom objectsNoPartialCustom fields only, not full objects
Workflow automationYesYes
AI featuresPartialAI-assisted email draftsPartialSales Assistant, limited scope
Native callingYesBuilt-in dialerYes
Public APIYesYes
Email & calendar syncYesYes
Reporting & dashboardsPartialPipeline analytics exist, BI is limitedYesInsights dashboards, AI-powered reports
Mobile appYesIncluded on all pricing tiersYesiOS/Android, though UX seen as clunky
Lead scoringPartialVia custom fields/Smart Views/ZapierPartialVia LeadBooster add-on, Premium tier up
Sales forecastingYesExpected Revenue ViewsYesDedicated Forecast view from Growth tier
Integrations verified80+400+
Aggregate rating4.7 · 620 reviews4.5 · 2.9k reviews
Integrations
ZapierHubSpotZoomGmailGoogle CalendarMicrosoft 365+6 more
SlackZoomMailchimpQuickBooksTrelloZapier+7 more
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPA
ISO 27001ISO 27701SOC 2 Type IIGDPR
Pros
  • Ease of use and a clean UI, one of the most cited strengths in reviews.
  • Built-in calling and email in one tool — no extra VoIP integration needed.
  • All-in-one workflow (calls, email, SMS, pipeline) reduces tool-switching.
  • Responsive, helpful customer support.
  • Easy to use, intuitive interface with fast onboarding.
  • Visual drag-and-drop pipeline and deal board.
  • Strong team collaboration and activity tracking.
  • Good value and affordability versus competitors like Salesforce and HubSpot.
Cons
  • Reporting and analytics feel limited for deeper customization versus enterprise CRMs.
  • Learning curve for teams new to sales-engagement tools.
  • Pricier than competitors once dialer/call-minute add-ons are factored in.
  • Linking emails to specific deals and file uploads is limited.
  • Reporting lacks depth and customization, especially at lower tiers.
  • Advanced features are locked behind higher-tier plans.
  • Per-seat pricing gets expensive as teams and add-ons scale.
  • Mobile app and search/filter UX are considered clunky by some reviewers.
Visit Close ↗Visit Pipedrive ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

Close

Close bundles a dialer, SMS, and email sequencing directly into the CRM so an inside-sales rep can start calling on day one without wiring up separate tools. The tradeoff is fewer administrative and reporting features than platform-scale CRMs.

A particularly good fit for: Small-to-mid-size, high-velocity outbound and inside sales teams (calling and email heavy). Solo founders or small teams wanting an all-in-one, easy-to-adopt sales CRM. Teams that want native calling and SMS without stitching together separate VoIP tools.

May be a poor fit if: Enterprises needing deep custom reporting/BI or complex multi-department CRM workflows. Teams needing heavy multi-channel orchestration beyond call, email, and SMS.

Pipedrive

Pipedrive centers the product on a visual pipeline of deal stages rather than a general-purpose object model. The feature set is intentionally leaner than HubSpot or Salesforce, which keeps onboarding fast for small sales teams that mainly need to track deals moving through stages.

A particularly good fit for: Small-to-midsize sales teams that want a simple, visual pipeline-first CRM. Organizations that prioritize fast setup with minimal training. Budget-conscious teams that want core CRM functionality cheaper than Salesforce or HubSpot.

May be a poor fit if: Enterprises needing deep, highly customizable reporting or analytics out of the box. Teams needing complex marketing automation or service/support-desk features natively.

Pricing and plan structure

Close: Published starting price $9 per user / month

  • Solo$9 per user / month
  • Essentials$35 per user / month
  • Growth$99 per user / month
  • Scale$139 per user / month

Pipedrive: Published starting price $14 per user / month

  • Lite$14 per seat / month
  • Growth$39 per seat / month
  • Premium$49 per seat / month
  • Ultimate$79 per seat / month

Capabilities worth validating

  • Close: Workflow automation, AI features, Native calling, Public API, Email & calendar sync Integrations include Zapier, HubSpot, Zoom, Gmail.
  • Pipedrive: Custom objects, Workflow automation, AI features, Native calling, Public API Integrations include Slack, Zoom, Mailchimp, QuickBooks.

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does Close's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Pipedrive's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Zapier, HubSpot, Zoom support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between Sales & CRM tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative Sales & CRM workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Zapier, HubSpot, Zoom: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Structured signals help narrow the shortlist, but a trial with a real workflow is still the best way to validate the decision.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-07-19. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: Close product site, G2; Pipedrive product site, G2